At the first part of the interview, he makes the same case for war that Bush did. I think people forget that and look at the person making the case instead of the fact that prior to the war everyone, including the Democrats, believed that Saddam was building the weapons. Despite making the case, Clinton did nothing to stop Saddam and emboldened him by lobbing missiles instead of taking him down. Another note on the prior review. The President, in almost any case, does not control the economy. The best a President can do is set up obstacles (IE taxes or regulation) or remove them (IE tax cuts and freeing up markets). It is the American people and it's businesses and new innovation that drive the economy. The biggest gains during the Clinton years were in Real Estate and in Technology. Both of which crashed many years later; tech during the end of his term and the quasi-recession of 2000 and Real Estate started crashing last year. Clinton nor Bush are responsible for either the gains or losses.

I forgot how much I love this guy! Every hardball that comes his way,
he voodoos into a slow easy one over the plate and at worst he foul
tips it. A Mighty Casey.Sound likes Bill greazzed the Chinese and Hill used her Wal-Mart
connections to sell U.S.'ins out. But the times were good for
everyone. That's the real reason the Righties hate the Clintons.His ethics statements in the Pre-Lewinsky era is worthy of some
Rolaids. And Tim Russert just 11 years ago....ahem Pre-Booze
schnowze.