I just looked up the movie on wikipedia, they announced awhile back apparently they removed any supernatural elements from the movie adaptation.

Why can't they ever make a good Bret Easton Ellis movie? I haven't even seen the movie yet, and I know that its going to be horrible. No vampires, they added a kidnapping plot that never existed in the novel, they have Kim Bassinger's character having a melodramatic breakdown that never even happened in the book. Its like they got the ideas and the themes correct, but um....did they give up. somewhere? Rules of Attraction, great book, horrible film, Less Than Zero was a good book, but the movie became a public service announcement for how bad drugs are and no horrible snuff film, American Psycho was watered down and someone tried to throw a twist ending on it, Christian Bale did do a good job though. So this, I expect the same form this. They're also working on a movie adaption of Lunar Park. The bile is rising in my throat.Good trailer, but misleading.LDS

i saw no vampires....

are they kidding me...this movie looks like it going to blow major chunks
BUT, I'll buy the soundtrack
I love the 80s

I went to see this movie since the trailer seemed interesting. Boy, was I mislead. This movie was quite horrible. I understood why the director did the things that were done in the movie; though I felt like my time was wasted. The themes and issues dealt with in the movie seem rather pointless, and I felt any further thinking about this movie when I walked out would just made me more stupid. The bottom line is: dont see this movie. DONT! You'll thank me later.