Just 2 comments here,
First: Hulu has managed to spell the name of the movie / river wrong, it should be "Great Wall Across the Yangtze" (left out the g)
Second: This documentary was made in 2000 almost 9 years b4 the dam was fished, keeping that in mind when you view this film will help with your prospective

And the devastating earthquakes that have happened in the area are results of the massive weight of the water being held back by the dam.I guess not all of the "idiots" have been proven wrong.

I don't guess we saw the same documentary. They interviewed several project engineers working on the dam. They interviewed opponents of the dam. They interviewed ordinary people who would be affected by the dam. They interviewed government officials. And yes, they interviewed Americans whose expertise in areas the dam would effect added to the overall story of the impact of the dam.I'm sure there were very few Chinese citizens who felt comfortable speaking even with indifference about the project for fear of retaliation by their government.The documentary did present a rather biased point of view, but not without enumerating some of the benefits thought to be gained by the project first, such as flood control and the production of electricity. These benefits, however, were shown to be empty as there were other ways of controlling flooding and producing electricity by way of the Jangtze's tributaries. In the end, it seems the project's completion has been little else but political chest-thumping by the Chinese government.