, no no no, reverse osmosis doesnt do it. Look it up, it only filters down to .05 microns. the chemicals, lead, pesticides all still in there, and in some places radioactive or heavy metal material [yes, very serious] mercury, yep, thats why they test fish in all municipalities and tell you how much of certain types of fish is healthy for you to eat./? yeah, never heard of that either, its real, all our inland lakes are polluted to some degree and so they came up with an acceptable level for us to eat, great HUH?, Back to the point, purifying the water, not just filtering out the crap you can see and smell, but actually pure water, you remember it was called H20, now its 97 percent H20 and 3 percent???????? a whole list of chemicals. Bottled water is merely tap water, unless of course your buying the good stuff that comes in a glass bottle. I believe in the private sector developing these things, they can be extremely profitable, especially the water, but once the gov gets involved, holy schmoke and choke, with red tape and the thing the fed does best,,WASTE. , We dont need the gov involved, take the best and brightest from our universities let them compete to come up with the best solutions and then , check with the germans and see what they got in comparison, more than likely they already engineered it some time ago or have a solution simpler and cheaper with fewer moving parts, best engineers in the world. Lets skip all political posturing and excuses for why we need to do better and lets work on doing better, if the big bankers will turn loose of the bucks we can make a start, one thing they didnt discuss aerated concrete or fiber optic lighting. If they want to reduce weight and have a fireproof building /aerated concrete, its 1/3 the weight of regular and if they use flyash like flexcrete did its 1/5 the weight and I don't have and carbon data on how much co2 they would save but Im sure its tremendous even though I think all that is bunk.
See 10 other replies















Now playing


