I think I fall somewhere in between. IF this sort of 'treatment' were medically and technologically possible, I'd be in support of a program in which people in prison, for instance, could agree to the procedure in exchange for payments to their families (or the families of whomever they harmed). It would have to be a volunteer type deal, of course, with the understanding that if they were proven wrongly incarcerated later, they would receive cells back.
That might actually be a good solution for many of the prison problems we have, as harsh as that might sound. Prisoners who'd been 'harvested' for those cells would be docile while not requiring excessive degrees of supervision. They would be less of a threat to guards and other prison staff, and would require less supervision because (it seems) the energy to commit violence upon others in prison would be lessened.
There would need to be a separate wing for the prisoners who volunteered, simply to protect them from those who didn't volunteer, but it seems like it would be a workable possibility, as long as participation really was voluntary.
The victims of the doctor didn't seem lobotomised, after all. They were simply... simple. And as long as it could be reversed in the event of an eventual overturning of the ruling that put the volunteers in prison in the first place, it would possibly be a good thing.
Assuming, of course, that the process were real and could actually work in the non-TV world, which... yeah, not likely. LOL
Just my opinion. Make of it what you will.
See 3 other replies