I agree with people that Hannah should not come back... HOWEVER I feel turning the TV off when Daisy is on seems like a very reasonable thing for me to do. I understand that the producers want a mix of different characters, and they want someone who is bubbly, BUT Daisy is just too much. She brings too much drama to the show. I mean come on we already have the bones/booth and the Hudgins/Angela drama going on and thats fine but too much of one things leads us further and further from the show.   See 9 other replies

Do I have to choose? I'd rather neither one came back.   See 9 other replies

I like them both actually. I thought Hannah was a fun character, though I agree that her and Booth probably wouldn't have worked out in the long run. She didn't have the personality to settle down into marriage. I don't think there's anything wrong with her for that it's just who she is. She likes traveling and being in the action, it probably makes her a good reporter.
Daisy used to irritate me like nobody's business but she's mellowed out a lot. I think Sweets is cute with her so I wouldn't mind her sticking around. I think it would be cool/depressing and maybe a bit morbid- but a cool plot- to have Hannah as a victim. They could find her body and have to identify it and then somehow she was involved in some conspiracy story that got her killed. I like her and don't really want to kill her off but sometimes killing a character that was invested in the show can be a good angle.   See 9 other replies

I mentioned this a long, long time ago. Hannah is a reflection of Booth which is why they are / were not ment to be. You don't want to spend your life with a carbon copy of your psyche. You want to spend it with someone that completes you as a person. Bones completes booth rather then mirrors him.I love Daisy. Daisy is the inner child that completes the outer child in Sweets. She gives him what he never had as a child. FUN. He was raised by older adpoted parents with no siblings. He didn't have a lot of fun as a kid. His facination with death metal was his anti-script that all kids go thru in the search for personal identity.   See 9 other replies

hannah, very good in her role, but too much happen so fast .   See 9 other replies

As a die-hard Booth and Bones shipper, I say: yes, please, shake things up. Those two were in a rut and the balance of power was totally out of whack. (Insofar as you would equate power with acknowledgment of feeling.) We badly needed an external influence to shift things around a little. As far as Hannah in herself as a character went... Meh. She had the requisite spunkiness to deal with Booth's alpha male tendencies, her own self-powered career where she excelled, and she got along with everyone pretty well. I liked her; but at the end of the day, I just didn't really care, and I didn't get the idea that was supposed to care about her beyond her relationship with Booth. So in my book, once a character like Hannah fulfills his or her role in the story, he or she becomes redundant in relation to that story. Though I'm sure they'll at least mention her again at some point, I have no interest in seeing her dragged back in for another stint as a recurring character.   See 9 other replies