I agree that it's a bit ridiculous how short their investigations are, especially since they jump to the conclusion that the story is just a myth if they didn't find any evidence. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!! I agree that TAPS is a bit better, but they tend to do the same thing where if they don't find evidence, they tell their client that the place isn't haunted, which is ridiculous. It makes me think that the producers of these shows actually want them to lean towards the more skeptical side in order to be allowed to be shown on mainstream media.
See 3 other replies








MySpace
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
reddit
Windows Live

Now playing

