Okay, I know that the show was cancelled before the main storyline could be concluded, but there's still one mystery that I can't get out of my head. Charlie found Kyle Hollis when he looked at Jack Reese's LAPD file and recognized him as the killer from a picture that Rachel drew of him after her family was murdered. When Kyle confessed to Crews, he also confessed to Constance (Charlie's old lawyer), because Charlie had her on the phone. Kyle also confessed to working for Jack Reese. But when confronted later by Charlie, he denied ever knowing Jack Reese. If Kyle was scared of Reese (or his pals), or if he was trying to protect Rachel, it makes sense that he would lie about his relationship with Reese. But when Charlie talks to Constance about it, she denies hearing Kyle talk about Jack Reese in his original confession. Now, did she lie? If so, was it because the people who set Charlie up got to her? Or did she just want him to stop looking for revenge? Or was she not lying? If she wasn't lying, she might have simply not heard that part of Hollis's confession, or it could all have been in Charlie's head. Of course that doesn't make any sense because the only clue that led him to Hollis was the fact that he was Reese's confidential informant. Now what I'm wondering is, did I miss something? Did they already explain why Constance said she didn't know anything about Jack Reese? And why did Charlie tell Dani that her dad had nothing to do with him getting framed? Was he sparing her feelings? Or are my questions left unanswered because the show got cancelled?
Just thought I'd address the conspiracy. Frankly I'm surprised that others haven't (to my knowledge).