Your argument presupposes that only two choices exist: do violence or do nothing. What about civil disobedience? I'll admit I don't believe it is the answer, but it is proof that there are alternatives that have yet to be considered. In the situation of the suicide bomber, killing him will not win. If you succeed in killing him, you prove that his enemies are evil and trying to impose themselves on foreign cultures, and your actions further the bomber's cause. If you don't kill him, innocent people die.
See 4 other replies
















