It was such a good movie, and it was spoiled by that rather poor, confused, weird ending but all in all a rather entertaining film.

|
8 days ago
1
Post contains spoiler.
[ Show spoilers ]
Then I might not have seen it. It does personnifiy the Bond films. Well, back to watching the film.
|
|
21 days ago
3
I thought it was really good
|
|
About 1 month ago
3
What a wild ride man! Like, far out....totally psychadelic. ...
|
|
About 1 month ago
1
I think it could have been done better. Next time I watch it I will skip to the more entertaining parts of the film. Seems like there is too much fluff when you don't want it. too ...
|
|
1 day ago
4
I was so dissappointed when the Casino Royale remake wasn't anything like the '67 original. I guess they wanted to buy into the whole Bourne Identity franchise, instead of ...
|
|
Posted 3 days ago
It was such a good movie, and it was spoiled by that rather poor, confused, weird ending but all in all a rather entertaining film.
Was this review helpful?
|
|
Posted 8 days ago
0 of 2 people found this review helpful
I guess it is this wonderful movie instead.
Was this review helpful?
|
|
Posted 20 days ago
1 of 1 person found this review helpful
Ah well...
This is a movie that couldn't decide if it was good or not. It would have periodic moments of genuine humor interspersed by long, long, long stretches of non-humor trying very hard to be what it isn't. Peter Sellers, of course, is funny, but he's in like... Half of it? Awwell.
And then all the scenes with Orson Welles were just weird...
And Woody Allen's brief cameo was fairly amusing.
Ultimately, it probably wasn't worth the time it took to watch.
Was this review helpful?
|
|
Posted 27 days ago
1 of 3 people found this review helpful
dude you're an idiot, its spoof movie, its not a real bond movie. way to go. watch some of the older REAL Bond movies with Roger Moore and especially sean connery and you'll realize why Daniel Craig suuuuucks.
Was this review helpful?
|