So because a person would kill one guy - for a very Particular reason
that means he would lie about anything at all - for NO reason?
What is that, tv cop logic?In the eyes of a jury he would probably seem less credible just because of the assumptions people would make about his general moral character, for good reason, I get that ... just in this conversation it sounded strange to me. Idk. How can she as a trained officer think that the guy investigating a homicide is suddenly just the victim of a "random" shooting instead of maybe that the logical conclusions of evidence are in fact clues. Come on. There's no stretch here. It's 2 and 2. This hardly seems like the behavior of any officer worth their salt.