I agree. Nancy dis-Grace should not be on tv. She like one of those loud-mouthed drunks in a bar who think they really know the answer to an issue. She is a blaring example of the pathetic lows that today's so-called media has sunken to. Is TMZ (and other tabloids) really that much worse than some of these "mainstream" talking heads? I wonder sometimes...   See 1 other reply

...well evidently the court proceedings in the state of Florida really need your help, Kip. Perhaps you'll be available to counsel them next time.   See 4 other replies

...that's all very long winded of you, Kip, but your comparison of this to a raid of Dhamer's house (where vats containing human remains were discovered, and also found in his freezer) is so nonsensical, that it immediately erodes the value of talking to you. Please try to connect your comparisons along the lines of logic in the future.   See 5 other replies

They don't have to prove exactly how she died, just that it was likely she was murdered. You can believe what you want, but if you are called for jury duty know that they do and do not need to show. They also don't need fingerprints or the perpetrators DNA to link someone to a murder. Often those things are not present at a crime. Those things are helpful to have, but people are tried and convicted using remains that have decayed significantly by linking the corpse to the perpetrator. Fingerprints and DNA wash away and the weapon is often disposed of, its not CSI and you are allowed to use common sense.   See 4 other replies

Oh really? So Jefferey Domer should have gotten off after dissolving people in acid? After all maybe they died of disease and he was just disposing of them in a sanitary way. You couldn't tell how they died after being degraded by acid after all. It was not circumstantial, and you do not need DNA and fingerprints for every crime and in fact they are often absent. People still committed crimes and were found guilty before DNA could be tested you know.People forget that everything, even science is circumstantial. How do you know when you jump an alien isn't really just simultaneously flipping a human magnet from very far away pulling you up? We go by whatever explains first: The most, and then by: what is simplest. No one can account for every possible variable but there comes a point where it is unlikely you will see simultaneous events without a particular cause.   See 5 other replies

He was too smart. So he couldn't dumb down an explanation of the evidence properly. Also didn't know when to sit down and be quiet after making a point.   See 5 other replies

...I think that the broad might not be a cold-blooded killer, so much as an irresponsible party girl that let her baby die because she was ficked up after a night of "hot body" partying somewhere, and tried to cover it up (just my theory). If I were on the jury, I would've turned against her when she let her lawyer say that ficked up shat about her dad and brother though. Wrong for that...   See 4 other replies