I had always wanted to know how a roman bath worked and was built. So that I can one day (or over several months realistically) build my own working bath, and use it. It seems technologically simple enough, just labor intensive to build. My only real problem with the team here is that they did indeed rush the job for not giving themselves proper time to do it right. And like most all Nova's projects, time is always the defeating factor. In the end it's, "Oh, we tried and it leaked, fell apart, or sank beneath the waves, but you get the picture". Uh, No! I'd prefer a working model to a mere digital display and a bunch of bumbling academic idiots who can't agree with each other and have to offer a Jerry Springer moment to liven up a yawn factor watching them cheat using modern methods. As for History lesson, Romans did not possess the most magnificent water ways and technology ever known to human kind. The people of the Americas had water ways that traveled for miles, and Up-Hill, that kept their crops often terraced on hills growing to feed the large populated centers, not to mention clean running water throughout their large cities which included sewage removal and treatment, as well as swimming pools and fountains, some hosting a million people, which still exist (water ways not the populations), and some still work after many hudred years from their own cultural collapse and an encroaching jungle. The technology of moving water is much more ancient than Rome, and in some cultures more impressive than what Rome did. So none of this hoity toity singling Rome out as the grand expression of human ingenuity because some sholars are infatuated with them. The information is false and just wrong dishing it like this. I could waver on the obsurd time slots building stuff if they'd stick with actual culturally historical facts.