look at all the brainwashing bullsh!t.....they spend the first half-hour showing all the positives of humans controlling the temperature in their immediate environment. then they have a nice air condition repair-man tell you that its getting oh-so-hot and he might have to find another job.... .... ...??? he's an air-conditioning installer/repairman! the more extreme weather is, hotter/colder, the more jobs he's getting= the more money he's making during a recession. do you really believe that little under-the-radar emotional tug, among many others in the introduction, is an accident? it certainly has no basis on whether or not we should try to control forces that for 95% of the population are truly not within their ability to fully comprehend. does asking random people if they would like it hotter or colder matter at all? are they really trying to show a correlation between being able to manufacture cooler or hotter air in a home or office and the kind of science that has to consider the state of the gases, ground, water, and atmospheric temperatures, positive and negative ions, atmospheric pressures, and a plethora of other macro and micro considerable variables that are constantly changing ALL OVER THE PLANET? are we ready for a world where the kind of people that CURRENTLY run it have control over the weather, assuming they COULD control it without destroying the ionosphere? or altering the earths electromagnetic fields? or let the military develop it? or just kill a sh!tload of people? this irresponsible piece of propaganda, disguised as educational, makes the average person go "hmm, wouldn't that be cool..". and thats exactly the point.because thats all they need for your vote of confidence. because only the minority do ANY valid thorough research anymore. and it is MUCH easier to make you agree with something if you don't have a definition for proof or causation. instead, you've been led to believe that when something "makes sense" (aka 'agrees with your world-view'), or has a correlation (basically just means two things happen in the same given instance), it is a given fact.its information that everyone seems to know and you are out of the group if you dont know or dont agree with it. using that element of our socially evolved response to new/popular information is a great way from keeping people from checking any facts. in fact, you just make a few places they can go and confirm "no no, you're already right, this is the answer", and then they dont have to learn anything about science. they dont have to learn anything about physics. they dont have to learn anything about math....because being "right", especially in social situations or concerns, reinforces the ego,which is where our identity or ID is rooted. it keeps us from feeling insecure, left-out, and unsuccessful. and if you accept that you might not know as much as you think you know, and start looking at numbers, chemicals, data, and research journals instead of reciting catchphrases and nodding at graphs, you start to absorb truth, and your ego starts to die. you start to lose your group identity and it becomes painfully obvious why most debates, even those pretending to be 'scientific' seem to depend on morally-indignant, self-righteous group-think, instead of comparing empirically scientific evidence and coming to a solution. that said, global warming is the biggest pile of sh!t on the planet. literally. ive given you a clue as to what to do from here, so im not going to waste time trying to convince those who are already hopelessly biased. dont follow me. follow yourself, and be true. reject emotional and personal comfort in favor of ultimate truth, and press ever onward. find the answers for yourself and spread the word. peace and love.