This gentleman is very smart... Impressed with his arguments. However, at 01:10:47 he mentions "our contribution to climate change...." Prior to that he mentions nuclear proliferation is bad, which I agree (in the sense of war, not energy - and if you want to argue Japan, I'll argue not building Nuclear Power Plants on KNOWN natural disaster ridden landscapes... And yes, the data supports Japan is more natural disaster prone than any economic superpower in relationship to population density). Sam Harris is intelligent and uses quantifiable data, and then uses climate change in relationship to human behavior / energy use? Causation and correlation is well presented and well supported that it simply doesn't support CO2 emissions and climate change... Considering the facts presented in "Red Hot Lies," are astounding. Climate change and simply saying, "I don't know, and we can't prove it..." is the only approach. Other than that, and I'm sorry for ranting, I like his points... Well done. Observation and clear reasoning.. Science... Simple.