The general experiment COULD have been interesting if there had been no human intervention during. The film sequence was a little choppy and I couldn't always figure out what the time frame was. The "best" part was the ending. I really didn't expect the ending, but I think it makes the rest of the weird movie make more sense. On another note, I did enjoy that the devolution of the "victims" seemed to coincide in Jimmy's devolution as well. Significance? Also, what's with the symbolism of the merry-go-round? Does it suggest that the human mind is cyclical, or that human behavior is cyclical and can be predicted?

Seriously, the only thing that kept me watching this movie was the background music. (and Kilmer's twitching. it seemed the most realistic thing in this movie)There were quite a few extraneous characters, such as the author girl who said she hated her therapy twice a week.The intercutting is horrible. That's really all I have to say about it. It just totally takes you out of the movie. And the so called "character development" or whatever when it comes to Grant was totally forced. For 90% of the movie, he was the level-headed, rational one, and all of a sudden, he's trying to kill Christopher and the girl. I mean what? I would just call that bad writing.And don't get me started on the policewoman's acting! She was over-doing all her lines.Overall, it held my attention enough to make me keep the tab open. Actually, the whole thing is just bad writing. It could have been a good movie, but someone in the production messed it up. Its quite funny, the longer i'm thinking about it post-watching, the more i dislike it.I think i'd better put this up before i give it a 1 star.