I would stomp on a baby if it looked at me wrong... dam.n babies so self-absorbed and whiny   See 24 other replies

It is a terrible thing but I would too... I would kill anybody, IF I ABSOLUTELY HAD TOO (No other choice what so ever.), to protect my children.   See 24 other replies

I served for 8 years and have killed people who didn't even pose a direct threat to me, my family, my country or hell probably didn't threaten anyone but themselves... so sure why not   See 24 other replies

What about quality over quantity? Would it to be better to save a dozen criminals over a couple of innocents? What about the severity of the crime? Is it better to save a several murders than a few drug addicts?Micheal certainly put a high priority on his family since he not only chose them over a plane load of strangers, he also chose his daughter over his whole race, the difference was that the plane full of people were innocent, but his race was guilty of of invasion and attempted genocide. So while was it more wrong to choose his family over his race of murderes or over the plane load of innocents?It could've gone a lot differently if Sophia had told Martinez the truth in the first place about Thomas and the rogue faction, then they could've found more solutions and compromised to help her people survive someplace without all the bloodshed on both sides   See 24 other replies

It comes down to a numbers situation. You are in an impossible situation where either choice kills innocents. If the number of innocent deaths is the same then both options are equal in terms of morality or whathaveyou. Since you have no choice but to kill innocents in this hypothetical, killing hundreds to save four is completely selfish and idiotic. But if the number of deaths are comparable, sure go ahead and save your family over strangers.   See 24 other replies

So, you're saying the pilot did the correct thing because of his loyalty to his family.   See 24 other replies