if it's not relevant to the film, don't post it. By the way, leave the man alone. Why don't you concentrate on all the Americans who have done far worse things and still walk among us without consequence.

No truly Polish person would write that kind of review or make Polish jokes. We have too much pride. So no, you can't get away with that.

Yeah, you can like Hitler's artwork. That doesn't bother me. His crappy drawings have nothing to do with the hate and atrocities he was responsible for. If, for example, I brutally killed someone and then said "Treat others the way you wish to be treated, let love and peace rule the world, respect your neighbor, and stay in school," would you disagree with what I said because I did something horrible? That is essentially what you are doing by claiming that a man's actions and his art are not separate. By your logic, one of the most beautiful paintings can be trash because the artist did something despicable. Some people think homosexuality is an immoral and condemnable act, and that it is just as bad a child molestation. Is the Mona Lisa ugly to people who think that? If Ansel Adams tortured animals, would his pictures look any different? If Faulkner killed someone while drunk driving, would his books suddenly become vapid soap operas because of his acts? Saying this movie is "by a child rapist" is really selling it short. What about the cinematographers, the actors, the writers, the producer, ect?I don't think Hulu showing this film will make people think child rape is ok either, and I don't see how Polanski is benefiting for it being shown here. If anything, the ridiculous amount of irrelevant comments talking about how evil he is will only hurt his reputation.