Do you think anyone is going to read that muddled rant of yours?   See 5 other replies

The following comment appeared momentarily on the hill blog.VIDEO: Obama goes after bankers in weekly address
By Michael O'Brien - 01/16/10 09:30 AM ET Why do we continue to trust congress and this administration why indeed, what is trust. In sociology and psychology the degree to which one party trusts another is a measure of belief in the honesty, benevolence and competence of the other party. Based on the most recent research, a failure in trust may be forgiven more easily if it is interpreted as a failure of competence rather than a lack of benevolence or honesty. In economics trust is often conceptualized as reliability in transactions. In all cases trust is a heuristic decision rule, allowing the human to deal with complexities that would require unrealistic effort in rational reasoning. So do we trust them because they have demonstrated there incompetence on a daily basis. The white hose mouthpiece refuses to answer direct questions or ignoring the asked question all together this would indicate a desire not to be caught in a lie or a desire to simply deny the truth. Candidate Obama won a campaign with this strategy. But this is not a strategy to govern by in a democracy unless you wish to usurp that democracy and transform it into socialism. I don't know where we should go from here but for me at least it is not where this administration is going I will fight with tooth and nail if need be.   See 5 other replies

How can we trust our elected officials when they have demonstrated a lack of honesty shown there malevolent nature and demonstrated a lack of competence at all levels of government. The Constitution is not just an old piece of paper as nancy peloci would have you believe or a list of negative rights as our president would have you believe. The Constitution is the corner stone of this once great republic it is the fundamental rights given to every citizen of the republic and it is every citizens write and responsibility to protect and defend. Our country was born in blood and fire an act of violence against the tyrannical rule of the crown at that time. It is from that violent action that our country has grown but we must not forget those roots because it is violence that maybe what saves us from the clear and present danger that has crept into our government under the guise of democrat and republican. This is not a danger that can be voted out in the next election cycle but one that must be removed as a dangerous tumor is cut out and destroyed for the good of all. To allow any to remain is to expect the cancer to return. As always posted everywhere and in multiple languages and now for a limited time in 3D. Could some one ask Nancy Peloci not to laugh on camera it terrifies my children.   See 5 other replies

Would you say that child molesters should be allowed to work in a preschool because they have the write to work no we lock them up and protect our children. How can you defend against a religion where any member can become a radical a danger to all other religions. Now a few comments closer to home the socialist faction that is trying to take over our government is a danger to every patriot that draws breath in our country today. We have lived in one of the longest lasting democracies on this planet to date to allow the fundamental transformation into a socialist regime where the party dictates to you has already begun if you have not already noticed. Congress cares no longer about the voices of there constituents self and party first. I have compared our congress to addicts and it is as addicts they should be treated. Extend them no trust no responsibility they should be supervised at all times and god damit drug test the lot of them now. If they can not be trusted to manage money god knows what other troubles they have gotten themselves into. Trust! Trust is defined In sociology and psychology the degree to which one party trusts another is a measure of belief in the honesty, benevolence and competence of the other party. Based on the most recent research, a failure in trust may be forgiven more easily if it is interpreted as a failure of competence rather than a lack of benevolence or honesty. In economics trust is often conceptualized as reliability in transactions. In all cases trust is a heuristic decision rule, allowing the human to deal with complexities that would require unrealistic effort in rational reasoning. continued   See 5 other replies

The following comment where posted only for a few minuets on 01/08/10 at about 0045 pst.January 7, 2010, 7:22 pm
The Big Question: What is your reaction to the Obama intel review? First of all how are we suppose to know when the idiot and chief is telling the truth we have very little evidence to go on to be able to trust him. Trust now that's a word I will come back to later but first lets talk terrorists shall we. Not all Muslims are Al Qaeda true but all of Al Qaeda are Muslims. So we are talking about simple matter of two to three degrees of separation between radical Muslim and a non radical Muslim. Remember now we are talking about a religion that by its very nature and the teaching of the Qoran is intolerant of all other religions. This in itself makes them a dangerous religion to allow to exist at all does this make me intolerant know it does not. The Muslim faith is dangerous to Catholics to Jews, Buddhists, and all other religions. To say that they should be allowed to exist is to argue that the Nazis have a place in the world today. The qoran states that all infidels must die so unless you are a Muslim they are a potential danger. This is hardly a matter of freedom of religion it about a religion that rewards murder and intolerance in the afterlife. They make the case for there own extermination much as the Nazis did to allow there continued existence is both foolhardy and reckless. continued   See 5 other replies