I caught that part, too--and it annoyed me as it evidently did you.It's a wrongheaded, ignorant viewpoint that holds that people who abide by the law and get themselves licensed to carry guns are going to be reckless threats to police officers.Besides, who is the incompetent documentarian who failed to report the facts correctly?: NO LICENSE TO CARRY IS REQUIRED IN ALASKA. THE LAW IS AKIN TO VERMONT'S.Unlike in Vermont, Alaskans have the option of getting licensed. In Vermont, there is no program to get a license to carry--if you're not a felon, drug abuser, or mental incompetent, you can carry. In Alaska, you can carry just as you can in Vermont, but Alaska also affords the option to get a license, which can be useful if one wishes to carry concealed in states that honor Alaska's license.But it's really just plain stupid to imply that guns in the cars of licensed carriers are some kind of present danger to cops. The fact is, it would be the UNlicensed carriers, who have never been background-checked, who might be the threat. Those are the people who might carry even if they are legally prohibited felons or something.