Okay, I am more than willing to look at hard evidence that some place is haunted. But when considering the door opening and closing, as you said yourself, an air vaccuum and the hill "theory" are solid points.All parts of this show are subjective, and their could have been a small breeze in the room that the was hard for the other people to detect. The door could latch if it was shut hard enough, my door does that all the time. And for the hill part, the door did close every time. They want to keep us in suspense so maybe they do omit some of their findings or purposely bypass science for speculation.Yes, maybe a ghost did do that, but I just don't understand why you are so willing to consider speculation as fact before considering all the factors of science that play into something as fact.We can't just seen what we want to see all the time, you have to consider all factors.   See 3 other replies

I just re-read that post I made, your "Grammar Spanking" one that is, and I did say "Seriously though," at the beginning of the next paragraph, so I throws meself on da moicy of da cort! Da Juree will be on my side wit there verdik my evidens is strong, your on da ropes on this un! ;-) Have a Happy Holiday Season! Maybe Santa will give us proof of ghosties. :D Thought I would throw this little bit of humor and well wishes hidden amongst the, to put it nicely, debates! :)   See 23 other replies

Oh yes, and sorry for the late reply, I'm one of those who use their HDTV as their monitor as well, so I often forget to check all my postings and even e-mail! I am listening to the first part now, and it's the Chris Fleming part, so you may have to go into another of the 4 parts to hear Zak's comments on the whole Bess incident. You will probably see skeptic vids of the incident as well if you search, but that link will take you to the GA team comments, okay, they didn't comment in the first one, so you will have to screen all 4, which is okay if you would like to see the rehash of the live show and the Zak and Nick's comments. Oh, and I just read online that Donna LaCroix has commented on staging in Ghost Hunters in a live webcast! Here's a link to the entire interview WARNING: Strong Language! http://www.mypodcast.com/fsaudio/ghostdivas_20091112_1120-536059.mp3 Remember, this is Donna's opinion, I tend to trust her though, I always liked her on the show, but we always have to take varying opinions with a grain of salt, the GH Fans and GH Skeptics are so divided, there are few people who can listen to both sides with an open mind. It's either GH or anti-GH with some on both sides going to the extreme in insults, which is sad. :-/   See 23 other replies

Sorry 'bout that ;) Yeah, I guess I should have included a ;) to help with the sarcasm, it is the hardest thing to get across without doing <dripping sarcasm> I guess.
You might find the Ron Bess event on youtube, I know what some people think about it on here when people try to show something is staged, but I would guess a "ghost adventures fake" search would bring it right up. But I do think it might be right on Ghost Adventures own website, did look, couldn't find anything easily, but someone has posted the whole 1 hour post-mortem done by the GA team, including comments on the Bess Incident, it's 4 parts, here's the first... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE7iki7iips&feature=related This is from the GA show itself, not someone doing their interpretation or comments.   See 23 other replies

Well played, Jack!I think I used proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling?Some people, huh? :)   See 23 other replies

Oh sorry. Misread the direction you were going with your comment.   See 5 other replies

I didn’t get it. At all. But we’ll move on with a wink and a grin I guess.
I guess I should have made my point more clear. Any person that derives their information from such a tainted medium, not just the one show, is bound to be in for some disappointment. Like you stated, there are A-holes prowling everywhere now-a-days that would rather hook people in with dramatics than inform them with reality. I totally agree with you on that point. These kinds of shows are fun to watch, but to fall hook line and sinker for their information is cheating yourself out of the truth of the matter. Can you tell me where to find that Ron Bess incident? I would love to watch that dude squirm. T.V. shows are for entertainment purposes first and foremost is all I’m saying, so it’s not shocking to discover falsification. What’s shocking is that so many people are committed to defending the authentication of every single event that takes place on them. Don’t let loyalty to a show take the place of reason people!
Humbug, it seems to me that we are on the same page here. Except, of course, when it comes to expressing sarcasm. At that point we part ways.... ;p   See 23 other replies