Urm, yeah the psych study on these works of art takes about two minutes. Ex-strippers who have been wronged by men seeking some form of legitimacy after their pole-dancing days are over, by turning their hatred of men into a pseudo-profession.
Point 1: the founder of the business has an intense hatred of men and has therefore made sure that her partner is an ineffective, non-threatening, effeminate pushover who she can be assured of dominating with her personality and intelligence.
Point 2: the results are consistent - the men are all guilty. Of course the signs have been so blatantly apparent that by the time the clients enlist the help of the team, it's just a waste of money. Each of the clients should have already trusted the obvious signs of cheating (example: if a couple doesn't use condoms yet one finds condoms in the other's pocket, is there really any need to hire a team of ex-strippers to try to prove that the partner is straying?) So these are not cold leads we are talking about, but rather, already essentially known cheaters with girlfriends who are in denial and hoping that if they pay and obsess enough, the investigators will determine that no, in fact hubby wasn't cheating in lieu of the obvious signs. Come on.
It would be a very interesting study to reverse the theme: instead of attractive women as bait for guys, use wealthy men as bait in sting operations targeting gold diggers. Same difference, folks.