The show looks great, but it seems like it will eventually have to use a paradox or two as a plot point.
For example, the nonsensical items the main character saw in the 'future,' such as the friendship bracelet, seem like they only exist on his 'wall of conspiracy' because he put them there, because he saw them there, because he put them there, etc. This is compounded by the writing on the cards, which is shown to be that of his partner, written when trying to discern their meaning, because he saw them in his 'flash-forward,' because he wrote them to find their significance, etc. The only elements that seem like they could possibly be related are the star tattoo and the picture of the melted doll, though it is possible he only keeps this picture when he finds it because he saw it, creating another endless loop of causality.
Also, it seems odd to me that no one seems to have had a 'vision' of anything incredibly out of the ordinary. Granted, having an affair or sulking around an office being stalked by assassins is hardly ordinary, but wouldn't one place more value on the day? Instead of 'fulfilling' their 'visions,' would they not do whatever they could to avoid it, in the case of an unwanted event, or consider that the day was somehow important and spend it waiting for the particular time. Forgive me, but if I had a 'flash-forward' to an exact point of the future that I could identify as a particular point in time, I would not spend it indisposed, as the boss of the main character did, I would make sure I was in a position to witness what if anything would happen. If all of the characters do fulfill their 'futures,' it can only be because they move toward these actions because they have seen them and feel they must obey some sort of twisted version of fate, or some other event will have to occur to remove any foreknowledge of the 'future,' or it will be revealed that these 'visions' are not of the future after all.

(continued)
Additionally, on the point of the FBI agent who did not see a 'vision,' while it is certainly possible that he will die of some natural cause, it seems more likely that he will die as a consequence of their investigation, or worse still, he will sacrifice himself on the circular logic that he has no future in any case. Either of these choices will again lead to an endless loop of causality.
It seems that in all likelihood, the 'visions' are either false or will end up causing themselves, creating a paradox, that while interesting, make very little sense.Also, was Seth MacFarlane acting as another FBI agent/ newscaster in this episode, or did the actor just look very similar to him?

do u want then to make the hole show in 1 episode ... all that will eventualy be explain .. remenber that they still need to show what ppl will put on that webside

Guys, I can explain the boss in the stall logic. When you got to go, you got to go.

It seems to me that all these potential plot holes are so big that no one would go through with the production of the show unless they'd found a way to make sense of them. Will the future be fulfilled or not? If so, what will compel the characters to do what they saw their future selves doing (esp. the boss in the stall)? It's these kinds of questions that will keep a lot of people watching, myself included.